The global BOPET Film Price Trend continued to move downward during the third quarter (Q3) of 2025. Across many major markets, prices declined by around 2% compared to the previous quarter, showing that the market remained under pressure. While the drop may not seem very large at first glance, it reflects a broader pattern of weak demand, cautious buying, and strong supply levels across regions.
BOPET film, widely used in flexible packaging, industrial lamination, electrical insulation, and specialty film applications, has been facing a challenging environment in 2025. Converters and packaging companies have been buying carefully, often purchasing only what they need instead of building large inventories. This cautious behavior has played a big role in shaping BOPET Film Prices worldwide.
Weak Demand and Cautious Buying
One of the main reasons behind the softer BOPET Film Price Trend in Q3 2025 was continued weak demand from downstream industries. Packaging converters, especially in flexible packaging, have been operating under margin pressure. End-user demand in sectors like food packaging, industrial applications, and consumer goods has not been strong enough to create aggressive restocking.
In many regions, buyers preferred to wait and watch rather than commit to large volumes. This cautious approach limited trading activity and kept the market quiet. Even when prices declined, buying interest did not improve significantly. As a result, BOPET Film Prices remained under pressure.
Export markets also showed slower activity. Many Asian suppliers, who traditionally rely on export demand, faced weaker inquiries from overseas buyers. This created additional competition among producers, as they tried to attract customers through more flexible pricing strategies.
Please Submit Your Query For BOPET Film Price Trend, Market Analysis and Forecast: https://www.price-watch.ai/book-a-demo/
Stable Feedstock, Limited Cost Support
Another important factor influencing the BOPET Film Price Trend was the stability in feedstock costs. Key raw materials such as PTA (Purified Terephthalic Acid) and MEG (Monoethylene Glycol) remained relatively stable during the quarter. Since raw material costs did not rise significantly, producers had limited cost pressure pushing prices upward.
Normally, when feedstock prices increase, producers try to pass on higher costs to customers. However, in Q3 2025, stable raw materials meant there was little support for price increases. In fact, in some regions, slightly softer feedstock prices further contributed to the decline in BOPET Film Prices.
This situation created a challenging balance. Producers were managing moderate operating rates to avoid excess inventory, but supply still remained sufficient in most markets. Without strong demand growth, even stable production levels felt like oversupply.
India: Moderate Decline with Bearish Sentiment
In India, the BOPET market saw a moderate decline during Q3 2025. Domestic prices for 12-micron plain film averaged around USD 1107 per metric ton, reflecting a 2% drop from the previous quarter. The overall tone of the market was slightly bearish.
Demand from packaging and industrial film sectors was steady but not strong. Converters continued to purchase carefully due to ongoing margin concerns. Producers maintained flexible production rates to manage inventory levels and remain competitive.
In September 2025, prices in India fell more sharply, with an average decline of around 6%. This monthly drop highlighted the growing pressure from soft demand and competitive pricing. Export activity remained slow, adding to the cautious mood in the market.
China: One of the Steeper Declines
China experienced a more noticeable decline in Q3 2025, with prices dropping around 6% during the quarter. Domestic spot prices for 12-micron plain BOPET film were assessed in the range of USD 970–985 per ton, among the lowest levels seen so far in 2025.
The weakness was largely linked to slower demand from flexible packaging, electrical insulation, and industrial lamination sectors. After mid-year holidays, many market participants expected demand to improve, but that recovery did not happen as hoped.
Stable operating rates among major producers meant supply remained consistent, but buying interest was limited. In September alone, prices fell around 2% month-on-month, reflecting ongoing inventory adjustments and competitive offers from domestic manufacturers.
China’s softer pricing also influenced export markets, as lower quotations from Chinese suppliers increased competition in other regions.
United States: Demand-Constrained Market
In the United States, imported BOPET Film Prices declined by about 2% in Q3 2025. The market remained supply-stable but demand-constrained. Converters and distributors were hesitant to rebuild inventories due to uncertain economic conditions and slower end-user consumption.
In September, the U.S. market saw an average decline of approximately 4%. Competitive offers from Asian countries, especially China and South Korea, added pressure on pricing. Buyers had multiple sourcing options, which kept negotiations firm and limited the ability of suppliers to push prices higher.
Overall, the U.S. market reflected a cautious approach, with balanced supply but limited enthusiasm from buyers.
Europe: Spain and Poland Under Pressure
In Europe, BOPET Film Prices also moved lower. Spain recorded a quarterly decline of around 2%, while Poland saw a sharper drop of approximately 4% during Q3 2025.
The European market has been dealing with slower economic activity and restrained consumer spending. Flexible packaging and industrial film demand remained weak, and converters chose minimal stock replenishment strategies.
In September, Spain saw a 4% decline, while Poland experienced an even steeper 8% drop. Competitive import offers from Asian suppliers, combined with sufficient supply within Europe, increased downward pressure. Feedstock costs provided limited support, and sellers adjusted prices to stimulate buying interest.
Southeast Asia: Mild but Persistent Softness
In the Philippines and Malaysia, the BOPET Film Price Trend showed mild declines of around 2% during Q3 2025. Compared to China or Poland, these markets were relatively stable but still slightly bearish.
Demand from packaging and lamination sectors remained soft. Buyers focused on managing existing inventories rather than making large purchases. In September, prices declined marginally—about 1%—reflecting small adjustments rather than dramatic changes.
Competitive offers from China, India, and other regional suppliers kept pricing flexible. Overall, the tone in Southeast Asia was calm but weak.
Nigeria and UAE: Steeper Corrections
Nigeria experienced one of the sharper declines, with prices falling around 5% in Q3 2025. Weak demand, currency volatility, and tight import financing conditions made buyers more cautious. Importers limited purchases, and competitive Asian pricing added further pressure.
In September, Nigerian prices slipped another 1%, reflecting ongoing softness.
The United Arab Emirates also saw a notable 5% quarterly decline. Subdued demand from flexible packaging converters and sufficient inventory levels kept buying activity low. Competitive offers from India and China, along with stable freight rates, supported the downward movement.
Overall Market Sentiment
Across all regions, the common theme in Q3 2025 was mild to moderate bearishness. The BOPET Film Price Trend showed that supply was generally adequate, feedstock costs were stable, and demand was not strong enough to absorb available volumes.
Producers adjusted operating rates and offered flexible pricing, but cautious procurement strategies limited trading momentum. Even in markets where declines were small, sentiment remained careful rather than optimistic.
Conclusion
In simple terms, Q3 2025 was a soft quarter for BOPET Film Prices globally. Most regions recorded declines between 2% and 6%, with some markets seeing sharper monthly drops in September. Stable raw material costs, steady production, and weak downstream demand shaped the overall market environment.
The key challenge was not high costs or supply shortages, but rather limited buying interest. Converters and distributors preferred controlled purchasing, which kept pressure on prices. Unless demand improves meaningfully, the BOPET Film Price Trend may continue to reflect cautious sentiment and competitive pricing in the near term.
For now, the global BOPET market remains balanced but fragile stable in supply, soft in demand, and sensitive to even small changes in buying activity.
